{"id":12441,"date":"2011-03-03T13:36:24","date_gmt":"2011-03-03T18:36:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/researchimpact.ydsinc.ca\/beyond-peer-review\/"},"modified":"2021-11-23T15:55:13","modified_gmt":"2021-11-23T20:55:13","slug":"beyond-peer-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/","title":{"rendered":"The art of going beyond peer review \/ L’art de d\u00e9passer la revue par les pairs"},"content":{"rendered":"

By David Phipps (ResearchImpact York)
\nIn a world of theatre, poetry, story telling, dance and art, peer review is necessary but not sufficient to disseminate research to diverse audiences.<\/em>
\nDans un monde de th\u00e9\u00e2tre, de po\u00e9sie, de r\u00e9cits, de danse et d’art, la revue par les pairs est une n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 mais n’est pas suffisante pour diss\u00e9miner la recherche \u00e0 des publics tr\u00e8s divers.<\/em>
\nI recently read a paper from the Research Unit for Research Utilization<\/a> titled, \u00ab\u00a0Helping social research make a difference<\/a>\u00ab\u00a0. The authors presented different methods of communicating research results to different audiences. Refreshingly it did not discuss the usual KMb tools we use to complement peer reviewed dissemination such as social media, research summaries and town halls.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\nDon’t get me wrong, these are all important and ResearchImpact-R\u00e9seauImpactRecherche (RI-RIR) uses all of these in our KMb practice. What Huw and Alison did is present some dissemination formats that we don’t see every day. The paper gets us thinking about:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Narratives and stories: fiction, faction and persuasion<\/li>\n
  2. Language shifts and metaphor diversity<\/li>\n
  3. Advertising, marketing and social marketing<\/li>\n
  4. Journeying together: co-producing knowledge; co-producing design<\/li>\n
  5. Immersion and experiential learning<\/li>\n
  6. Creativity and the arts<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    \"\"<\/a>RI-RIR bases its KMb practice on co-production but the others listed above are all very cool and are rarely utilized. Once exception I have seen is the play \u00ab\u00a0Seeing the Forest\u00a0\u00bb written by Julia Gray and Gail Mitchell. The play is based on the research of Gail Mitchell and Deborah Tregunno of York U’s School of Nursing and Liane Ginsburg from the School of Health Policy and Management. The researchers were funded by the Canadian Patient Safety Institute<\/a> to explore medial errors and patient safety throughout the process of providing health care. The play looks through the lens of the patient, the health care provider and the health care institution and illustrates those places and those practices that put patients’ safety at risk.
    \nTheir work was written up by     Hospital News<\/a> and was recently presented to over 300 staff of Ontario Community Care Access Centres<\/a> that connects patients and families with the care they need, at home and in their community. In addition the researchers are writing up their findings for publication in a peer reviewed journal, again illustrating that alternative forms of research dissemination complement traditional academic peer review.
    \nWhile the play itself was instructive what cemented its ability to convey key research messages was what happened after the four actors took their bow. The four picked up a sign each containing the following words: <\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Blinding familiarity<\/li>\n
    2. Dismissive urgency<\/li>\n
    3. Unyielding determination<\/li>\n
    4. Illusion of control<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      The researchers found that these are the four primary determinants of medical errors. The researchers then engaged the audience in a dialogue about these four issues turning the event from one of knowledge transfer (=dissemination) to one of knowledge exchange (=engagement). It was this exchange that allowed the researchers to summarize their research in key messages.
      \n      \"\"<\/a>Peter Levesque recently mused about the power of poetry to be a medium for KMb<\/a> – check out the KMb Rap<\/a>. Linda Hawkins of ResearchImpact-Guelph will be presenting on storytelling at CUExpo 2011<\/a> in May 2011. York U’s Deborah Barndt<\/a> is the Coordinator of the Community Arts Practice Certificate Program. The KTE Community of Practice presented a seminar on Research-Based Dance as Knowledge Translation<\/a>. PREVNet, which has an explicit KMb mandate, consulted on the libretto of an opera about bullying, called Elijah’s Kite<\/a>.
      \nTheatre. Poetry. Dance. Art. Storytelling. Opera. There’s a huge array of research dissemination that complements traditional academic peer reviewed publishing. Tell us your stories. Paint us a picture or write us a poem about some non-traditional forms of research dissemination you have seen or used in your KMb practice.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      By David Phipps (ResearchImpact York) In a world of theatre, poetry, story telling, dance and art, peer review is necessary but not sufficient to disseminate research to diverse audiences. Dans un monde de th\u00e9\u00e2tre, de po\u00e9sie, de r\u00e9cits, de danse et d’art, la revue par les pairs est une n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 mais n’est pas suffisante pour […]<\/p>\n

      Lire la suite\u2026 from The art of going beyond peer review \/ L’art de d\u00e9passer la revue par les pairs<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2386],"tags":[1536,2015,1571,2016],"class_list":["post-12441","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-archive","tag-arts-fr-2","tag-dissemination-fr-2","tag-kmb-fr-2","tag-peer-review-fr-2"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe art of going beyond peer review \/ L'art de d\u00e9passer la revue par les pairs - Research Impact Canada<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The art of going beyond peer review \/ L'art de d\u00e9passer la revue par les pairs - Research Impact Canada\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By David Phipps (ResearchImpact York) In a world of theatre, poetry, story telling, dance and art, peer review is necessary but not sufficient to disseminate research to diverse audiences. Dans un monde de th\u00e9\u00e2tre, de po\u00e9sie, de r\u00e9cits, de danse et d’art, la revue par les pairs est une n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 mais n’est pas suffisante pour [...]Lire la suite\u2026 from The art of going beyond peer review \/ L’art de d\u00e9passer la revue par les pairs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Research Impact Canada\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-03T18:36:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-11-23T20:55:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/03\/ruru.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Connie Tang\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Connie Tang\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/beyond-peer-review\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/beyond-peer-review\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Connie Tang\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/394e3b399bbe436d094e028d9c00962d\"},\"headline\":\"The art of going beyond peer review \\\/ L’art de d\u00e9passer la revue par les pairs\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-03T18:36:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-23T20:55:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/beyond-peer-review\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":633,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/beyond-peer-review\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\\\/2011\\\/03\\\/ruru.png\",\"keywords\":[\"Arts\",\"Dissemination\",\"KMb\",\"Peer Review\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Archiv\u00e9\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/beyond-peer-review\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/beyond-peer-review\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/beyond-peer-review\\\/\",\"name\":\"The art of going beyond peer review \\\/ L'art de d\u00e9passer la revue par les pairs - Research Impact Canada\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/beyond-peer-review\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/beyond-peer-review\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\\\/2011\\\/03\\\/ruru.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-03T18:36:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-23T20:55:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/beyond-peer-review\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/beyond-peer-review\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/beyond-peer-review\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\\\/2011\\\/03\\\/ruru.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\\\/2011\\\/03\\\/ruru.png\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/beyond-peer-review\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/accueil\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The art of going beyond peer review \\\/ L’art de d\u00e9passer la revue par les pairs\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Research Impact Canada\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Research Impact Canada\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/RIC-FR-CMYK.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/RIC-FR-CMYK.jpg\",\"width\":286,\"height\":66,\"caption\":\"Research Impact Canada\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/394e3b399bbe436d094e028d9c00962d\",\"name\":\"Connie Tang\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/author\\\/connie\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The art of going beyond peer review \/ L'art de d\u00e9passer la revue par les pairs - Research Impact Canada","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"The art of going beyond peer review \/ L'art de d\u00e9passer la revue par les pairs - Research Impact Canada","og_description":"By David Phipps (ResearchImpact York) In a world of theatre, poetry, story telling, dance and art, peer review is necessary but not sufficient to disseminate research to diverse audiences. Dans un monde de th\u00e9\u00e2tre, de po\u00e9sie, de r\u00e9cits, de danse et d’art, la revue par les pairs est une n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 mais n’est pas suffisante pour [...]Lire la suite\u2026 from The art of going beyond peer review \/ L’art de d\u00e9passer la revue par les pairs","og_url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/","og_site_name":"Research Impact Canada","article_published_time":"2011-03-03T18:36:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-11-23T20:55:13+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/03\/ruru.png","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Connie Tang","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Connie Tang","Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/"},"author":{"name":"Connie Tang","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/394e3b399bbe436d094e028d9c00962d"},"headline":"The art of going beyond peer review \/ L’art de d\u00e9passer la revue par les pairs","datePublished":"2011-03-03T18:36:24+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-23T20:55:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/"},"wordCount":633,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/03\/ruru.png","keywords":["Arts","Dissemination","KMb","Peer Review"],"articleSection":["Archiv\u00e9"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/","name":"The art of going beyond peer review \/ L'art de d\u00e9passer la revue par les pairs - Research Impact Canada","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/03\/ruru.png","datePublished":"2011-03-03T18:36:24+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-23T20:55:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/03\/ruru.png","contentUrl":"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/03\/ruru.png"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/beyond-peer-review\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/accueil\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The art of going beyond peer review \/ L’art de d\u00e9passer la revue par les pairs"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/","name":"Research Impact Canada","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#organization","name":"Research Impact Canada","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/RIC-FR-CMYK.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/RIC-FR-CMYK.jpg","width":286,"height":66,"caption":"Research Impact Canada"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/394e3b399bbe436d094e028d9c00962d","name":"Connie Tang","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/author\/connie\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12441","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12441"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12441\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}