{"id":12453,"date":"2011-01-12T12:31:05","date_gmt":"2011-01-12T17:31:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/researchimpact.ydsinc.ca\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/"},"modified":"2021-11-23T15:55:06","modified_gmt":"2021-11-23T20:55:06","slug":"knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Knowledge Dissemination: blogging vs peer review"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><\/strong><em><a href=\"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/01\/quill-and-ink1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-2999\" title=\"quill and ink\" src=\"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/01\/quill-and-ink1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"223\" height=\"183\" \/><\/a>In an age of self publishing &#8211; including blogs, videos, and other Web-based media &#8211; why do we still seek to publish in traditional academic peer-reviewed journals?\u00a0 Vanity.<\/em><br \/>\nResearchImpact-York published two academic papers in 2009.\u00a0 In 2010 we had one in press, two submitted, and one just rejected for a second time, from the same journal.\u00a0 Since our first post on May 30, 2008, ResearchImpact has published 206 blogs on Mobilize This!, an average of 6 or 7 each month.<br \/>\nHere&rsquo;s a comparison of blogging and peer-reviewed publishing:<br \/>\nTIME: I started drafting our paper on ResearchSnapshot clear language summaries in July 2009.\u00a0 I submitted with revisions in September.\u00a0 It just got rejected.\u00a0 I can write a blog in about one hour and get it posted in 20 minutes.<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/01\/evp-front-cover.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-2992\" title=\"EvP front cover\" src=\"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/01\/evp-front-cover.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"99\" height=\"145\" \/><\/a>ACCESS: We published our first paper on York&rsquo;s KMb Unit in Evidence &amp; Policy [Phipps, D.J. and Shapson, S. 2009. Knowledge mobilisation builds local research collaboration for social innovation. Evidence &amp; Policy. 5(3): 211-227].\u00a0 I have no idea who, apart from my mother, has read this paper.\u00a0 Mobilize This! has received 55,171 page views as of December 28, 2010 and has a subscriber list of over 1200.\u00a0 Blogs are accessible to anyone with an internet connection.\u00a0 Except for Open Access journals, most journals limit access to those who can afford a subscription.<br \/>\nRESPONSIVENESS: Blogging also has the added feature of allowing readers to respond by leaving comments. Try the comment feature below to leave your thoughts and let everyone know what you&rsquo;re thinking.\u00a0 Now, try to do the same with a peer-reviewed paper you&rsquo;ve printed out.<br \/>\nPAYBACK:\u00a0 I am not an academic.\u00a0 Unlike scholars seeing tenure and promotion based on their publications, my publications do not have an impact on how my performance is measured.<br \/>\nIf it takes less time to reach more people in a two-way fashion, why do I take the trouble to publish in peer-reviewed journals if it doesn&rsquo;t benefit me in any way?<br \/>\nPeer review provides a level of quality control; however, so does blogging.\u00a0 If you don&rsquo;t find our writing valuable you won&rsquo;t return to this blog or you&rsquo;ll tell us so.\u00a0 And even though I believe peer-reviewed publishing and blogging are complementary, both take time.\u00a0 So why do we continue to take the time to pursue both forms of dissemination when blogging seems to meet our needs?<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/01\/peer-review1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-3001\" title=\"peer review\" src=\"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/01\/peer-review1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"360\" height=\"270\" \/><\/a>In practical terms, publishing in peer-reviewed journals gives us credibility in the eyes of one of our key constituents: faculty.\u00a0 Faculty&rsquo;s currency is peer review.\u00a0 We gain credibility when faculty peers approve our work and find it worthy of publication.\u00a0 But the real truth is, publishing in peer-reviewed journals provides a sense of personal satisfaction that boarders on vanity.\u00a0 I enjoy the sense of satisfaction when faculty peers (finally) approve our publications.\u00a0 At the end of the day my ego is stroked when our work is accepted for peer-reviewed publication as well as when I receive comments on Mobilize This!\u00a0 Together, these two forms allow you, the KMb stakeholder, to know that our work is not only immediate, accessible and engaging (thank you, blogging!) but it also has the peer reviewed seal of approval (even if the seal is delayed by 12-18 months).<br \/>\nAs Web 2.0 and open access move into the academy I predict we will increasingly see a blend of peer-reviewed and online media.\u00a0 To get to there from here all we need to do is change tenure and promotion, peer review, and the academic publishing industry. \u00a0I&rsquo;ll get right on that\u2026.after my next blog\u2026<br \/>\n\ufeff<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In an age of self publishing &#8211; including blogs, videos, and other Web-based media &#8211; why do we still seek to publish in traditional academic peer-reviewed journals?\u00a0 Vanity. ResearchImpact-York published two academic papers in 2009.\u00a0 In 2010 we had one in press, two submitted, and one just rejected for a second time, from the same [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/\">Lire la suite\u2026<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> from Knowledge Dissemination: blogging vs peer review<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2386],"tags":[2015,1571,2016,1534],"class_list":["post-12453","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-archive","tag-dissemination-fr-2","tag-kmb-fr-2","tag-peer-review-fr-2","tag-social-media-fr-2"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Knowledge Dissemination: blogging vs peer review - Research Impact Canada<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Knowledge Dissemination: blogging vs peer review - Research Impact Canada\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In an age of self publishing &#8211; including blogs, videos, and other Web-based media &#8211; why do we still seek to publish in traditional academic peer-reviewed journals?\u00a0 Vanity. ResearchImpact-York published two academic papers in 2009.\u00a0 In 2010 we had one in press, two submitted, and one just rejected for a second time, from the same [...]Lire la suite\u2026 from Knowledge Dissemination: blogging vs peer review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Research Impact Canada\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-12T17:31:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-11-23T20:55:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/01\/quill-and-ink1.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Connie Tang\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Connie Tang\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Connie Tang\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/394e3b399bbe436d094e028d9c00962d\"},\"headline\":\"Knowledge Dissemination: blogging vs peer review\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-12T17:31:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-23T20:55:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":580,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\\\/2011\\\/01\\\/quill-and-ink1.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Dissemination\",\"KMb\",\"Peer Review\",\"Social media\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Archiv\u00e9\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\\\/\",\"name\":\"Knowledge Dissemination: blogging vs peer review - Research Impact Canada\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\\\/2011\\\/01\\\/quill-and-ink1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-12T17:31:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-23T20:55:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\\\/2011\\\/01\\\/quill-and-ink1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\\\/2011\\\/01\\\/quill-and-ink1.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/archive\\\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/accueil\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Knowledge Dissemination: blogging vs peer review\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Research Impact Canada\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Research Impact Canada\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/RIC-FR-CMYK.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/RIC-FR-CMYK.jpg\",\"width\":286,\"height\":66,\"caption\":\"Research Impact Canada\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/394e3b399bbe436d094e028d9c00962d\",\"name\":\"Connie Tang\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/author\\\/connie\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Knowledge Dissemination: blogging vs peer review - Research Impact Canada","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Knowledge Dissemination: blogging vs peer review - Research Impact Canada","og_description":"In an age of self publishing &#8211; including blogs, videos, and other Web-based media &#8211; why do we still seek to publish in traditional academic peer-reviewed journals?\u00a0 Vanity. ResearchImpact-York published two academic papers in 2009.\u00a0 In 2010 we had one in press, two submitted, and one just rejected for a second time, from the same [...]Lire la suite\u2026 from Knowledge Dissemination: blogging vs peer review","og_url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/","og_site_name":"Research Impact Canada","article_published_time":"2011-01-12T17:31:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-11-23T20:55:06+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/01\/quill-and-ink1.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Connie Tang","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Connie Tang","Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/"},"author":{"name":"Connie Tang","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/394e3b399bbe436d094e028d9c00962d"},"headline":"Knowledge Dissemination: blogging vs peer review","datePublished":"2011-01-12T17:31:05+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-23T20:55:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/"},"wordCount":580,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/01\/quill-and-ink1.jpg","keywords":["Dissemination","KMb","Peer Review","Social media"],"articleSection":["Archiv\u00e9"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/","name":"Knowledge Dissemination: blogging vs peer review - Research Impact Canada","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/01\/quill-and-ink1.jpg","datePublished":"2011-01-12T17:31:05+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-23T20:55:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/01\/quill-and-ink1.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/researchimpact.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/01\/quill-and-ink1.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/archive\/knowledge-dissemination-blogging-vs-peer-review\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/accueil\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Knowledge Dissemination: blogging vs peer review"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/","name":"Research Impact Canada","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#organization","name":"Research Impact Canada","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/RIC-FR-CMYK.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/RIC-FR-CMYK.jpg","width":286,"height":66,"caption":"Research Impact Canada"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/394e3b399bbe436d094e028d9c00962d","name":"Connie Tang","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/author\/connie\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12453","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12453"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12453\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12453"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12453"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12453"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}