{"id":18601,"date":"2022-12-05T09:01:30","date_gmt":"2022-12-05T14:01:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/?p=18601"},"modified":"2022-12-05T10:26:55","modified_gmt":"2022-12-05T15:26:55","slug":"abandon-du-mot-stakeholder","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/","title":{"rendered":"Abandon du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Le mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb (partie prenante) est de plus en plus contest\u00e9 en raison de ses connotations coloniales. Cela vous a-t-il frapp\u00e9 et essayez-vous d&rsquo;autres mots ?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">En novembre, Mark Reed a publi\u00e9 un <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fasttrackimpact.com\/post\/why-we-shouldn-t-banish-the-word-stakeholder?postId=1a6b9631-56a5-416e-a796-86d6dfb30d87\">article de r\u00e9flexion<\/a> sur l&rsquo;utilisation du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb, concluant que  \u00ab finalement, cela signifie qu&rsquo;il faut repenser notre utilisation du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb. \u00bb<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le probl\u00e8me avec le mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb est que dans un contexte colonial, un \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb \u00e9tait la personne qui enfon\u00e7ait un pieu dans la terre pour d\u00e9limiter la terre qu&rsquo;il ou elle occupait ou volait aux territoires autochtones. Si l&rsquo;on continue \u00e0 utiliser ce terme, on peut consid\u00e9rer qu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;un manque de respect \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9gard des peuples autochtones et que cela perp\u00e9tue la colonisation et la retraumatisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le message de Mark a \u00e9t\u00e9 suivi d&rsquo;une discussion assez anim\u00e9e sur <a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/posts\/davidjphipps_why-we-shouldnt-banish-the-word-stakeholder-activity-6962008550491504640-fAmW\/?utm_source=linkedin_share&amp;utm_medium=ios_app\">LinkedIn<\/a>. La seule conclusion est que tout le monde respecte la discussion. Certaines options pour remplacer \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb \u00e9taient le d\u00e9tenteur de droits, les constituants de MdC, l&rsquo;actant et les b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaires potentiels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le 25 novembre, R\u00e9seau Impact Recherche Canada (RIRC) a organis\u00e9 une discussion sur l&rsquo;utilisation du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb lors d&rsquo;une session Dr RIC &#8211; un appel mensuel dirig\u00e9 par les membres o\u00f9 les membres de RIRC \u00e9laborent l&rsquo;ordre du jour. Environ 25 participants membres de RIRC \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents. \u00c0 l&rsquo;avance, j&rsquo;ai envoy\u00e9 le premier message de Mark et la discussion sur LinkedIn qui a suivi pour que tout le monde soit sur la m\u00eame longueur d&rsquo;onde. Certains points int\u00e9ressants ont \u00e9t\u00e9 soulev\u00e9s au cours de la discussion :<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u00ab Stakeholder \u00bb n&rsquo;est pas utilis\u00e9 par certains qui ont une pratique de recherche communautaire. Le terme est per\u00e7u comme une expression corporative.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Il a une \u00ab ambiance d&rsquo;homme \u00bb.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>J&rsquo;ai v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 aupr\u00e8s du copr\u00e9sident du conseil autochtone de l&rsquo;Universit\u00e9 York, et il n&rsquo;\u00e9tait pas au courant de la question. Cela ne veut pas dire que ce n&rsquo;est pas le cas, mais simplement que ce n&rsquo;est pas une discussion qui a impr\u00e9gn\u00e9 tous les milieux autochtones.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">L&rsquo;une des conclusions est qu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;une question qui d\u00e9passe les contextes autochtones et qu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit donc d&rsquo;une discussion importante, que l&rsquo;on aborde ou non la question sous l&rsquo;angle de la d\u00e9colonisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Voici quelques options pour \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb :<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Ceux qui sont dans le cercle<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Ceux qui se soucient\/devraient se soucier<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Partenaires &#8211; bien qu&rsquo;il ait \u00e9t\u00e9 reconnu que cela avait une d\u00e9finition l\u00e9gale.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Mon souci avec tout autre terme que \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb est que j&rsquo;utilise r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement \u00ab stakeholder engagement \u00bb (l&rsquo;engagement des parties prenantes). Il se trouve sur toutes mes diapositives. Nous avons d\u00e9velopp\u00e9 un outil pour \u00ab <a href=\"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/gog-stkengagtfinalaccessiblefr-180326193232.pdf\">stakeholder engagement<\/a> \u00bb. Et \u00ab ceux qui sont dans le cercle de l&rsquo;engagement \u00bb ou \u00ab ceux qui se soucient de l&rsquo;engagement \u00bb sont des alternatives maladroites \u00e0 \u00ab stakeholder engagement \u00bb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Parties [potentiellement] int\u00e9ress\u00e9es<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ce terme est apparu dans la discussion du Dr RIC et je suis en train de l&rsquo;essayer. Dans ma pratique de la mobilisation des connaissances, je consid\u00e8re que les personnes qui ont d\u00e9j\u00e0 accept\u00e9 de participer \u00e0 un projet sont des <em>parties int\u00e9ress\u00e9es<\/em>. Ceux que je n&rsquo;ai pas encore engag\u00e9s mais qui pourraient \u00eatre int\u00e9ress\u00e9s par un projet sont des <em>parties potentiellement int\u00e9ress\u00e9es<\/em>. J&rsquo;ai fait une pr\u00e9sentation \u00e0 <a href=\"https:\/\/innovationyork.ca\/knowledge-mobilization\/mobilize-yu\/\">MobilizeYU<\/a> le 1er d\u00e9cembre et, alors que mes diapositives sur <a href=\"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/archived\/evolving-the-co-produced-pathway-to-impact-document-conjoint-sur-la-trajectoire-vers-limpact-toujours-plus-de-precision\/\">la trajectoire conjointe vers l&rsquo;impact<\/a> contenaient toujours les mots \u00ab stakeholder engagement \u00bb, j&rsquo;ai expliqu\u00e9 le contexte de la recherche d&rsquo;une alternative et j&rsquo;ai continu\u00e9 \u00e0 utiliser \u00ab <em>s&rsquo;engager avec des parties [potentiellement] int\u00e9ress\u00e9es<\/em> \u00bb tout au long de la pr\u00e9sentation. J&rsquo;ai ensuite v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 aupr\u00e8s de Michael Johnny, gestionnaire de KMb York, qui a donn\u00e9 son accord.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Je ne vais pas changer mes diapositives pour l&rsquo;instant. Je veux voir si les <em>parties [potentiellement] int\u00e9ress\u00e9es<\/em> vont passer sous ma langue et dans mon lexique. Si\/quand ce sera le cas, je changerai mes diapositives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">D&rsquo;ici l\u00e0, si je tr\u00e9buche, soyez patient.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb (partie prenante) est de plus en plus contest\u00e9 en raison de ses connotations coloniales. Cela vous a-t-il frapp\u00e9 et essayez-vous d&rsquo;autres mots ? En novembre, Mark Reed a publi\u00e9 un article de r\u00e9flexion sur l&rsquo;utilisation du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb, concluant que \u00ab finalement, cela signifie qu&rsquo;il faut repenser notre [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/\">Lire la suite\u2026<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> from Abandon du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1479],"tags":[2485,2484],"class_list":["post-18601","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-en-vedette","tag-partie-prenante","tag-stakeholder-2"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Abandon du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb - Research Impact Canada<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Abandon du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb - Research Impact Canada\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb (partie prenante) est de plus en plus contest\u00e9 en raison de ses connotations coloniales. Cela vous a-t-il frapp\u00e9 et essayez-vous d&rsquo;autres mots ? En novembre, Mark Reed a publi\u00e9 un article de r\u00e9flexion sur l&rsquo;utilisation du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb, concluant que \u00ab finalement, cela signifie qu&rsquo;il faut repenser notre [...]Lire la suite\u2026 from Abandon du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Research Impact Canada\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-12-05T14:01:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-12-05T15:26:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"David Phipps\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"David Phipps\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/en-vedette\\\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/en-vedette\\\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"David Phipps\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/37dc8ffa4bd64a9494944c1a51fb9af6\"},\"headline\":\"Abandon du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-05T14:01:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-05T15:26:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/en-vedette\\\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":662,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"partie prenante\",\"stakeholder\"],\"articleSection\":[\"En vedette\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/en-vedette\\\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/en-vedette\\\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/en-vedette\\\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\\\/\",\"name\":\"Abandon du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb - Research Impact Canada\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-05T14:01:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-05T15:26:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/en-vedette\\\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/en-vedette\\\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/en-vedette\\\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/accueil\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Abandon du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Research Impact Canada\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Research Impact Canada\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/RIC-FR-CMYK.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/RIC-FR-CMYK.jpg\",\"width\":286,\"height\":66,\"caption\":\"Research Impact Canada\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/37dc8ffa4bd64a9494944c1a51fb9af6\",\"name\":\"David Phipps\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/researchimpact.ca\\\/fr\\\/author\\\/david-phipps\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Abandon du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb - Research Impact Canada","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Abandon du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb - Research Impact Canada","og_description":"Le mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb (partie prenante) est de plus en plus contest\u00e9 en raison de ses connotations coloniales. Cela vous a-t-il frapp\u00e9 et essayez-vous d&rsquo;autres mots ? En novembre, Mark Reed a publi\u00e9 un article de r\u00e9flexion sur l&rsquo;utilisation du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb, concluant que \u00ab finalement, cela signifie qu&rsquo;il faut repenser notre [...]Lire la suite\u2026 from Abandon du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb","og_url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/","og_site_name":"Research Impact Canada","article_published_time":"2022-12-05T14:01:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-12-05T15:26:55+00:00","author":"David Phipps","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"David Phipps","Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/"},"author":{"name":"David Phipps","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/37dc8ffa4bd64a9494944c1a51fb9af6"},"headline":"Abandon du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb","datePublished":"2022-12-05T14:01:30+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-05T15:26:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/"},"wordCount":662,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#organization"},"keywords":["partie prenante","stakeholder"],"articleSection":["En vedette"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/","name":"Abandon du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb - Research Impact Canada","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-12-05T14:01:30+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-05T15:26:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/en-vedette\/abandon-du-mot-stakeholder\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/accueil\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Abandon du mot \u00ab stakeholder \u00bb"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/","name":"Research Impact Canada","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#organization","name":"Research Impact Canada","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/RIC-FR-CMYK.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/RIC-FR-CMYK.jpg","width":286,"height":66,"caption":"Research Impact Canada"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/37dc8ffa4bd64a9494944c1a51fb9af6","name":"David Phipps","url":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/author\/david-phipps\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18601","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/29"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18601"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18601\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18601"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18601"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/researchimpact.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18601"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}