Sandy Chan, Author at Research Impact Canada

Knowledge Exchange and Legislatures

Publié le mars 23, 2020 (janvier 10, 2024)

UK Parliament (February 2020) Knowledge Exchange and Legislatures. https://www.assembly.wales/en/bus-home/research/academic-engagement/Pages/knowledge-exchange.aspx Abstract Knowledge exchange (KE) refers to any activity or process in which information is exchanged between at least two parties. This briefing gives an overview of KE between universities and the four UK legislatures, to inform the development of KE strategies and activities for universities […]

Lire la suite… from Knowledge Exchange and Legislatures

Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers

Publié le février 24, 2020 (janvier 10, 2024)

Graham, I.D., McCutcheon, C. & Kothari, A. Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Res Policy Sys 17, 88 (2019) https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7 Abstract Research co-production is about doing research with those who use it. This approach to research has been receiving increasing attention from research funders, academic […]

Lire la suite… from Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers

Outcomes and Impacts of Development Interventions

Publié le janvier 22, 2020 (janvier 10, 2024)

Belcher, B. and Palenberg, M. (2018) Outcomes and Impacts of Development Interventions: Toward Conceptual Clarity. Am J. Eval. 39(4) 478-495. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1098214018765698 Abstract The terms “outcome” and “impact” are ubiquitous in evaluation discourse. However, there are many competing definitions that lack clarity and consistency and sometimes represent fundamentally different meanings. This leads to profound confusion, […]

Lire la suite… from Outcomes and Impacts of Development Interventions

Extending Research Impact Literacy

Publié le novembre 27, 2019 (janvier 10, 2024)

Bayley, J.E. and Phipps, D. (2019) Extending the Concept of Research Impact Literacy: levels of literacy, institutional role and ethical considerations. Emerald Open Research. 1:14 https://emeraldopenresearch.com/articles/1-14/v1 Abstract Building on the concept of ‘impact literacy’ established in a previous paper from Bayley and Phipps, here we extend the principles of impact literacy in light of […]

Lire la suite… from Extending Research Impact Literacy

Broadening the Scope of Impact

Publié le septembre 23, 2019 (janvier 10, 2024)

Harland, K. and O’Connor, H. (2015) Broadening the Scope of Impact. http://www.smalladvancedeconomies.org/wp-content/uploads/SAEI_Impact-Framework_Feb_2015_Issue2.pdf Forward (this report does not have an abstract) This report is prepared by the Science and Innovation group of the Small Advanced Economies Initiative (SAEI). The SAEI brings officials and experts from New Zealand, Israel, Singapore, Denmark, Finland, and Ireland together to consider […]

Lire la suite… from Broadening the Scope of Impact

Building a Framework for the Evaluation of Knowledge Translation for the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies

Publié le septembre 3, 2019 (janvier 10, 2024)

Sketris, I.S., Carter, N., Traynor, R.L., Watts, D., & Kelly, K. (2019). Building a framework for the evaluation of knowledge translation for the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4738 Abstract Purpose: The Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES), a network of pharmacoepidemiologists and other researchers from […]

Lire la suite… from Building a Framework for the Evaluation of Knowledge Translation for the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies

Research Impact Responsibilities: Policy Alternatives for Canada

Publié le juillet 8, 2019 (janvier 10, 2024)

MacGregor, S. (2019). Research impact responsibilities: Policy alternatives for Canada. Graduate Student Symposium, Selected Papers 2019. https://qspace.library.queensu.ca/handle/1974/26034 Abstract How research evidence comes to have impacts in academic and nonacademic arenas is increasingly becoming a focal point in scholarly discourse across scholarly disciplines and jurisdictional boundaries. However, despite the growing recognition that research impact is a […]

Lire la suite… from Research Impact Responsibilities: Policy Alternatives for Canada

Assessing the Impact of Healthcare Research: A Systematic Review of Methodological Frameworks

Publié le mai 24, 2019 (janvier 10, 2024)

Cruz Rivera, S., Kyte, D.G., Aiyegbusi, O.L., Keeley, T.J., & Calvert, M.J. (2017). Assessing the impact of healthcare research: A systematic review of methodological frameworks. PLoS Medicine 14(8): e1002370. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002370 Abstract Background: Increasingly, researchers need to demonstrate the impact of their research to their sponsors, funders, and fellow academics. However, the most appropriate way of […]

Lire la suite… from Assessing the Impact of Healthcare Research: A Systematic Review of Methodological Frameworks

The Dos and Don’ts of Influencing Policy: A Systematic Review of Advice to Academics

Publié le mars 26, 2019 (janvier 10, 2024)

Oliver, K. & Cairney, P. (2019). The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: A systematic review of advice to academics. Palgrave Communications, 5(21). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0232-y Abstract Many academics have strong incentives to influence policymaking but may not know where to start. We searched systematically for, and synthesised, the ‘how to’ advice in the academic peer-reviewed and […]

Lire la suite… from The Dos and Don’ts of Influencing Policy: A Systematic Review of Advice to Academics

ISRIA Statement: Ten-Point Guidelines for an Effective Process of Research Impact Assessment

Publié le février 20, 2019 (janvier 10, 2024)

Adam, P., Ovseiko, P.V., Grant, J., Graham, K.E.A., Boukhris, O.F., Dowd, A-M., Balling, G.V., Christensen, R.N., Pollitt, A., Taylor, M., Sued, O., Hinrichs-Krapels, S., Solans‐Domènech, M., Chorzempa, H., & the International School on Research Impact Assessment (ISRIA). (2018). ISRIA statement: Ten-point guidelines for an effective process of research impact assessment. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16:8, […]

Lire la suite… from ISRIA Statement: Ten-Point Guidelines for an Effective Process of Research Impact Assessment

Auteur/autrice : Sandy Chan

Articles par Sandy Chan