La promotion et la titularisation constituent un problème pour les chercheurs engagés, mais peut-être pas pour la raison que vous pensez.

David Phipps estime qu’il n’y a probablement rien à redire sur les politiques de promotion et de titularisation. Ce sont plutôt les comités de promotion et de titularisation qui posent un défi pour les chercheuses et chercheurs engagés. La promotion et la titularisation (PT) préoccupent depuis longtemps les chercheuses et chercheurs engagés. Le savoir engagé […]

Lire la suite… from La promotion et la titularisation constituent un problème pour les chercheurs engagés, mais peut-être pas pour la raison que vous pensez.

Incorporating Community Engagement Language into Promotion and Tenure Policies: One University’s Journey

Pelco, L.E. & Howard, C. (2016). Incorporating community engagement language into promotion and tenure policies: One university’s journey. Metropolitan Universities, 27(2), 87-98, DOI: 10.18060/21129 https://journals.iupui.edu/index.php/muj/article/view/21234 Abstract This case study describes the campus context and process for successfully including community engagement language into promotion and tenure policies at Virginia Commonwealth University, a high research, urban public […]

Lire la suite… from Incorporating Community Engagement Language into Promotion and Tenure Policies: One University’s Journey

Whose Incentives and Whose Rewards?

This post by David Phipps, RIR-York, was first published on the Community Knowledge Exchange blog on August 6, 2014 and is reposted here with permission. I recently posted a Linked In discussion titled “It’s time to stop complaining about tenure and promotion and do something about it”. That post was based on the often cited barrier […]

Lire la suite… from Whose Incentives and Whose Rewards?